6000 Gamers Pick DLSS 4.5 as Top Quality

๐ก6K blind test crowns DLSS 4.5 over native/FSRโproof AI upscaling wins for graphics devs.
โก 30-Second TL;DR
What Changed
6,000 gamers participated in label-free blind test
Why It Matters
Validates DLSS 4.5 as preferred AI upscaling solution, potentially accelerating NVIDIA adoption in games and boosting AI graphics performance standards.
What To Do Next
Test DLSS 4.5 integration in your Unity or Unreal projects for AI-enhanced upscaling benchmarks.
๐ง Deep Insight
Web-grounded analysis with 4 cited sources.
๐ Enhanced Key Takeaways
- โขComputerBase's blind test of 6,000 gamers showed DLSS 4.5 achieved 48.2% preference for image quality, with no game where FSR 4 outperformed it[2]
- โขDLSS 4.5 demonstrated superior sharpness compared to FSR 4, which produces a softer presentation across tested titles[1]
- โขPerformance gains: FSR 4 delivered 179% faster performance than native TAA at 1080p, while DLSS 4.5 achieved 128% faster, and FSR 4 offered 67% more performance than native at 4K[1]
- โขTest covered six games at 4K resolution with quality presets: Anno 117, ARC Raiders, Cyberpunk 2077, Horizon Forbidden West, Satisfactory, and The Last of Us Part II[2]
- โขSatisfactory showed DLSS 4.5's largest margin of preference at 60.9% of votes, followed by Horizon Forbidden West at 56.3%, demonstrating consistent quality advantages across diverse game types[2]
๐ Competitor Analysisโธ Show
| Metric | DLSS 4.5 | FSR 4 | Native Rendering |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blind Test Preference (6,000 gamers) | 48.2% | Lower | Lower |
| Image Sharpness | Superior | Softer presentation | Baseline |
| 1080p Performance vs Native TAA | 128% faster | 179% faster | 100% (baseline) |
| 4K Performance vs Native | 50% more | 67% more | 100% (baseline) |
| Best Game Result | Satisfactory (60.9%) | None (0% wins) | Anno 117 (22.8%) |
| Consistency | Won all 6 games tested | Lost all games | Lost all games |
๐ ๏ธ Technical Deep Dive
โข DLSS 4.5 uses transformer-based upscaling architecture for improved image reconstruction โข FSR 4 (Redstone) employs spatial upscaling with softer filtering characteristics โข Both technologies tested at 4K resolution with Quality presets enabled โข DLSS 4.5 shows 20%+ performance loss on older RTX 30 and 20 series GPUs compared to DLSS 4.0 โข FSR 4 achieves higher raw performance gains but at the cost of perceived image softness โข Test methodology used identical gameplay footage with blind voting to eliminate bias from branding
๐ฎ Future ImplicationsAI analysis grounded in cited sources
DLSS 4.5's decisive victory in blind testing suggests Nvidia's transformer-based upscaling approach has achieved meaningful perceptual quality advantages over AMD's FSR 4 technology. This outcome may influence game developer adoption decisions, with potential acceleration of DLSS 4.5 integration in upcoming titles. However, FSR 4's superior raw performance gains (179% vs 128% at 1080p) indicate AMD's technology remains competitive for performance-focused gamers willing to accept softer image presentation. The test results underscore the ongoing quality-versus-performance tradeoff in upscaling technologies and may drive AMD to refine FSR's sharpness characteristics in future iterations to close the perceptual quality gap.
โณ Timeline
๐ Sources (4)
Factual claims are grounded in the sources below. Forward-looking analysis is AI-generated interpretation.
- youtube.com โ Watch
- Tom's Hardware โ Nearly Half of Pc Gamers Prefer Dlss 4 5 Over Amds Fsr and Even Native Rendering Nvidia Scores Clean Sweep in Blind Test of Six Titles
- en.gamegpu.com โ Nioh 3 Sravnitelnye Benchmarki C Nvidia Dlss 4 5 I Amd Fsr 4
- techspot.com โ 3084 Nvidia Dlss 45 vs Amd Fsr 4
Weekly AI Recap
Read this week's curated digest of top AI events โ
๐Related Updates
AI-curated news aggregator. All content rights belong to original publishers.
Original source: cnBeta (Full RSS) โ


