🐯虎嗅•Stalecollected in 10m
China's 688 Policy Simplifies Green Energy for CBAM
💡Learn how Chinese industrial policy is using 'shared infrastructure' to solve the EU's strict carbon tax compliance.
⚡ 30-Second TL;DR
What Changed
688 Policy enables 'one-to-many' green power direct connection.
Why It Matters
This policy shifts the burden of green compliance from individual corporate investment to shared infrastructure, potentially saving millions for export-oriented manufacturers.
What To Do Next
If your company exports to the EU, audit your energy procurement strategy to see if you can join a 688-compliant industrial park to lower your carbon tax exposure.
Who should care:Enterprise & Security Teams
Key Points
- •688 Policy enables 'one-to-many' green power direct connection.
- •Provides a valid evidence chain for CBAM 'actual emission' accounting.
- •Reduces infrastructure costs for SMEs by allowing shared energy access.
- •Enables hour-level green electricity traceability required by EU standards.
🧠 Deep Insight
Web-grounded analysis with 18 cited sources.
🔑 Enhanced Key Takeaways
- •The '688 Policy' expands upon an earlier 'one-to-one' direct green power connection framework, allowing renewable energy plants to supply green electricity directly to multiple users through dedicated lines, bypassing the public grid.
- •This policy is a strategic move by China to address significant renewable energy curtailment, where rapid wind and solar expansion has outpaced the grid's ability to absorb it, leading to widespread energy waste, particularly in western regions.
- •The policy specifically targets high-energy-consuming entities like industrial parks and data centers, aiming to ease pressure on the national grid by promoting greater local consumption of renewable power.
- •The EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) officially entered its definitive charging phase on January 1, 2026, imposing substantial carbon tariff costs on Chinese exports, such as an average of 340 euros per ton of aluminum products.
- •To ensure the required hour-level green electricity traceability, the '688 Policy' mandates power grid enterprises to install two-way time-sharing metering devices at generation, consumption, and energy storage points, with traceability results directly pushed to the national green certificate issuance and trading system.
🛠️ Technical Deep Dive
- The policy requires the installation of two-way time-sharing metering devices at various power generation, power consumption, and energy storage ports within a project.
- These devices enable hour-level matching of new energy power generation and consumption, with traceability results directly pushed to the national green certificate issuance and trading system.
- China is integrating blockchain technology into its national green electricity certification system to provide full-chain verification of green electricity across its production, transmission, and consumption stages.
- This blockchain implementation aims to ensure transparency, prevent double-counting, and establish an immutable traceability base for green electricity attributes.
- The system is designed to achieve hourly granularity in certificate issuance and matching, which is crucial for enhancing credibility and enabling high-value applications like 24/7 clean energy matching.
🔮 Future ImplicationsAI analysis grounded in cited sources
The '688 Policy' will significantly enhance the competitiveness of Chinese export-oriented industries subject to EU CBAM.
By providing a verifiable and granular mechanism for green energy consumption, Chinese companies can demonstrate actual emissions reductions, potentially reducing or avoiding CBAM tariffs and gaining a cost advantage.
China's green electricity certificate (GEC) market will experience increased demand and improved liquidity, particularly from export-focused manufacturers.
The policy's emphasis on verifiable green power consumption and its integration with the national green certificate system will drive greater participation and demand for GECs, especially from industries needing to comply with international carbon regulations.
The policy will accelerate the widespread adoption of advanced metering and blockchain technologies across China's energy sector.
The stringent requirements for hour-level traceability and full-chain certification necessitate the deployment of these technologies to ensure compliance, data integrity, and the credible attribution of green energy.
⏳ Timeline
2005
China's Renewable Energy Law was issued, establishing foundational policies for renewable energy development.
2017
China's Green Electricity Certificate (GEC) market officially launched as a voluntary pilot program.
2023-10-01
The EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) transitional phase began, requiring quarterly reporting of embedded emissions for certain imported goods.
2026-01-01
The EU CBAM officially entered its definitive (charging) phase, requiring importers to purchase CBAM certificates and submit verified emissions reports.
2026-02
China's State Council released guidelines proposing the integration of blockchain technology for full-chain green electricity verification as part of a broader national electricity market reform.
2026-05-20
China's National Development and Reform Commission and National Energy Administration issued the 'Notice on Promoting the Orderly Development of Direct Connection of Green Electricity for Multiple Users' (No. 688 [2026]), upgrading the direct green power connection model from 'one-to-one' to 'one-to-many'.
📎 Sources (18)
Factual claims are grounded in the sources below. Forward-looking analysis is AI-generated interpretation.
📰
Weekly AI Recap
Read this week's curated digest of top AI events →
👉Related Updates
AI-curated news aggregator. All content rights belong to original publishers.
Original source: 虎嗅 ↗