Understanding ECCV provisional paper acceptance status
๐กConfused by your ECCV notification? See what the community says about the provisional acceptance status.
โก 30-Second TL;DR
What Changed
Clarification on ECCV provisional acceptance status
Why It Matters
Helps researchers manage expectations and understand the nuances of top-tier computer vision conference notification systems.
What To Do Next
Check the official ECCV author guidelines or the CMT portal for specific status definitions if you received a provisional acceptance.
๐ง Deep Insight
Web-grounded analysis with 17 cited sources.
๐ Enhanced Key Takeaways
- โขProvisional acceptance in academic publishing, including for conferences like ECCV, typically signifies that a manuscript has been accepted on the condition that minor revisions recommended by reviewers are successfully addressed.
- โขECCV operates as a biennial research conference, alternating years with the International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), and is recognized as one of the top-tier conferences in the computer vision field, alongside CVPR and ICCV.
- โขThe ECCV review process is double-blind and confidential, involving strict deadlines for reviewers, a rebuttal period for authors, and a subsequent discussion phase among reviewers and area chairs to finalize decisions.
- โขECCV 2026 introduced the option for authors to specify the 'Contribution Type' of their paper, a change aimed at fostering more nuanced and context-aware evaluation during the review process.
- โขAcceptance rates for ECCV are highly competitive, with an average acceptance rate of 28.8% over the last five years, and specific instances like ECCV 2024 seeing 27.9% of submissions accepted.
๐ Competitor Analysisโธ Show
| Feature | ECCV | CVPR | ICCV |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | Biennial (even years) | Annual | Biennial (odd years) |
| Scope | Top-tier Computer Vision & Machine Learning | Top-tier Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition | Top-tier Computer Vision & Machine Learning |
| Review Process | Double-blind, confidential, with rebuttal and discussion phases | Double-blind, similar multi-stage review | Double-blind, similar multi-stage review |
| Acceptance Rate | ~28.8% (last 5 years); 27.9% (2024) | ~30% (approximate) | ~25% (2021, iirc) |
๐ฎ Future ImplicationsAI analysis grounded in cited sources
โณ Timeline
๐ Sources (17)
Factual claims are grounded in the sources below. Forward-looking analysis is AI-generated interpretation.
Weekly AI Recap
Read this week's curated digest of top AI events โ
๐Related Updates
Same topic
Explore #academic-publishing
Same product
More on eccv
Same source
Latest from Reddit r/MachineLearning
Breaking into ML without a Master's degree

Multivariate Probability Models in Machine Learning
Open-Source ML Pipeline for Hong Kong Horse Racing Prediction
Career Dilemma: AI Industry Role vs. Master's Degree
AI-curated news aggregator. All content rights belong to original publishers.
Original source: Reddit r/MachineLearning โ