Splitting ArXiv Paper for NeurIPS 2026?

🔑 Enhanced Key Takeaways

• •NeurIPS 2026 submission guidelines explicitly address 'dual submission' and 'salami slicing' policies, requiring authors to disclose related preprints and explain how the new submission provides significant, non-incremental contributions.
• •The NeurIPS review process utilizes automated plagiarism and similarity detection tools (such as Crossref Similarity Check) that flag high overlap between submitted manuscripts and existing ArXiv preprints, increasing the likelihood of desk rejection if the split is not sufficiently distinct.
• •Community consensus on platforms like r/MachineLearning suggests that 'salami slicing' is frequently penalized by reviewers who perceive it as an attempt to artificially inflate publication counts, often leading to lower scores compared to a single, comprehensive paper.

🔮 Future ImplicationsAI analysis grounded in cited sources

⏳ Timeline