Purported NeurIPS Accepted-Paper List Appears Online
π‘A possible NeurIPS leak could expose confidential reviews and disrupt researchersβ publication planning.
β‘ 30-Second TL;DR
What Changed
A GitHub repository allegedly contains an HTML list of approximately 7,000 papers.
Why It Matters
If authentic, the leak could undermine double-blind peer review and expose confidential submission information before official announcements. Because the claim is unverified, researchers should avoid treating the repository as an authoritative acceptance list.
What To Do Next
Do not download, cite, or distribute the purported list; instead, verify acceptance decisions through the official NeurIPS website and report suspected confidential-data exposure to GitHub and NeurIPS.
Key Points
- β’A GitHub repository allegedly contains an HTML list of approximately 7,000 papers.
- β’Some papers are anonymized, while submission details reportedly appear accurate.
- β’The Reddit post asks whether the list is genuine or merely coincidental.
Weekly AI Recap
Read this week's curated digest of top AI events β
πRelated Updates
Same topic
Explore #paper-leak
Same product
More on neurips
Same source
Latest from Reddit r/MachineLearning
Isnad Tests Weakest-Link Trust on 577K Chains
MoM Bundles Multiple Models into One Architecture
Sliding-Window Attention Challenges Linear Attention
SynthFin-AML Exposes Temporal Leakage in GNN Benchmarks
AI-curated news aggregator. All content rights belong to original publishers.
Original source: Reddit r/MachineLearning β
This is a summary, not the original. Read the source, or get the weekly briefing.
Weekly AI briefing
One email a week. Unsubscribe anytime.