Nemotron 3 4B Disappoints vs Qwen 3.5 4B Benchmarks

💡Nemotron-3-4B launch flops in tough benchmarks vs Qwen—key for local LLM picks.
⚡ 30-Second TL;DR
What Changed
Nemotron 3 4B launched with hype for unique architecture and large context
Why It Matters
Temers expectations for small open-weight models; context size insufficient without strong reasoning. Local LLM users may stick with Qwen 3.5 4B for now.
What To Do Next
Benchmark Nemotron-3-4B Q8 against Qwen 3.5 4B on your reasoning prompts.
Key Points
- •Nemotron 3 4B launched with hype for unique architecture and large context
- •Qwen 3.5 4B Q8 passed all complex math/reasoning tests with correct JSON
- •Nemotron 3 4B Q8 failed dense multi-part test, producing incomplete output
- •Benchmarks include S(n) closed form, floor sums mod 29, Möbius pseudocode, Lucas theorem
🧠 Deep Insight
Background and context from public sources — not the original article. 8 sources cited.
🔑 Enhanced Key Takeaways
- •Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, a larger variant, has a 1M token context window but trails Qwen3.5-4B in GPQA (75.0% vs 76.2%), MMLU-Pro (78.3% vs 79.1%), and MMLU-ProX (59.5% vs 71.5%) benchmarks[1][3].
- •Qwen3.5-4B supports multimodal inputs including images, unlike Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B which is text-only[1].
- •Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B released in December 2025, postdating Qwen3 4B's April 2025 launch, yet underperforms the smaller model in key reasoning metrics[3].
- •Qwen 3.5 achieves top leaderboard scores like 88.4% on GPQA Diamond and 92.6% on IFEval, highlighting superior instruction following and scientific reasoning[5].
📊 Competitor Analysis▸ Show
| Metric | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3.5-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 32B total, 3.6B active | 4B |
| Context Window | 262k-1M tokens | Not specified (smaller in comparisons) |
| Multimodal | Text only | Yes (text + images) |
| GPQA | 75.0% | 76.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.3% | 79.1% |
| Release | Dec 2025 | Recent (post-Apr 2025) |
🛠️ Technical Deep Dive
- •Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B uses Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture with 31.6B total parameters and 3.6B active at inference, supporting up to 1M token context window[3][4].
- •Qwen3.5-4B is a dense 4B parameter model with multimodal capabilities for text and images, excelling in standardized reasoning benchmarks without specified MoE usage[1].
- •Larger Nemotron 3 Super (120B total, 12B active) employs Hybrid Mamba-2 + Transformer + LatentMoE, but still lags Qwen3.5-122B on SWE-Bench Verified (60.47% vs 66.40%)[2].
🔮 Future ImplicationsAI analysis grounded in cited sources
⏳ Timeline
📎 Sources (8)
Factual claims are grounded in the sources below. Forward-looking analysis is AI-generated interpretation.
- llm-stats.com — Nemotron 3 Nano 30b A3b vs Qwen3.5 4b
- verdent.ai — Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen 3 Coding
- artificialanalysis.ai — Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30b A3b Reasoning vs Qwen3 4b Instruct
- artificialanalysis.ai — Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30b A3b Reasoning vs Qwen3 Vl 4b Reasoning
- vertu.com — Open Source LLM Leaderboard 2026 Rankings Benchmarks the Best Models Right Now
- anotherwrapper.com — Qwen 3 4b
- openrouter.ai — Qwen3.5 Plus 02 15
- forums.developer.nvidia.com — 363175
Weekly AI Recap
Read this week's curated digest of top AI events →
👉Related Updates
AI-curated news aggregator. All content rights belong to original publishers.
Original source: Reddit r/LocalLLaMA ↗
This is a summary, not the original. Read the source, or get the weekly briefing.
Weekly AI briefing
One email a week. Unsubscribe anytime.