Lovable Denies Leak, Blames HackerOne

💡AI coding startup's botched security response lesson for builders
⚡ 30-Second TL;DR
What Changed
Free accounts could access others' credentials, chat history, source code
Why It Matters
Undermines trust in Lovable's security for AI coding users. Highlights risks of poor multi-tenant isolation in SaaS AI tools. May deter developers from similar vibe-coding platforms.
What To Do Next
Audit your AI coding tool's tenant isolation to block cross-account data access.
Key Points
- •Free accounts could access others' credentials, chat history, source code
- •Lovable attributed exposure to 'intentional behavior' and unclear docs
- •Company shifted blame to HackerOne bug-bounty service
- •Response criticized as mishandling vulnerability reports
🧠 Deep Insight
AI-generated analysis for this event — not the original article.
🔑 Enhanced Key Takeaways
- •The vulnerability stemmed from an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) flaw within Lovable's API endpoints, which failed to properly validate user authorization tokens when fetching project metadata.
- •HackerOne issued a public statement clarifying that their platform's triage process was not bypassed, noting that Lovable's internal security team had independently closed the report as 'Informative' before the public disclosure occurred.
- •Security researchers highlighted that Lovable's initial response violated standard Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure (CVD) practices by publicly disparaging the reporter's methodology rather than addressing the underlying architectural flaw.
📊 Competitor Analysis▸ Show
| Feature | Lovable | Cursor | Bolt.new | Replit Agent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Vibe-coding/No-code | AI Code Editor | Web-based AI App Dev | Full-stack IDE/Agent |
| Pricing Model | Freemium/Subscription | Subscription | Open Source/Cloud | Subscription |
| Security Posture | Under scrutiny (IDOR) | Enterprise-grade | Community-driven | Enterprise-grade |
🛠️ Technical Deep Dive
- •The vulnerability was identified as an IDOR (Insecure Direct Object Reference) vulnerability in the
/api/v1/projects/{project_id}endpoint. - •The API lacked server-side ownership verification, allowing any authenticated user with a valid JWT to access project objects by simply incrementing or guessing the UUID of other users' projects.
- •The platform utilizes a multi-tenant architecture where project data is stored in a shared PostgreSQL instance, and the application layer failed to enforce Row Level Security (RLS) policies for cross-tenant data access.
🔮 Future ImplicationsAI analysis grounded in cited sources
⏳ Timeline
Weekly AI Recap
Read this week's curated digest of top AI events →
👉Related Updates
AI-curated news aggregator. All content rights belong to original publishers.
Original source: The Register - AI/ML ↗
This is a summary, not the original. Read the source, or get the weekly briefing.
The weekly digest
One email a week. Unsubscribe anytime.