CUHK & Meituan Add Process Scores to Agents
🧠#reward-model#agent-trainingFreshcollected in 2m

CUHK & Meituan Add Process Scores to Agents

PostLinkedIn
🧠Read original on 机器之心

💡Process rewards teach Agents solid reasoning over lucky guesses—key for complex tasks.

⚡ 30-Second TL;DR

What changed

Agent-RRM evaluates full trajectories, outputting analysis, critique, and 0-1 process score.

Why it matters

Provides dense supervision for long-horizon Agent tasks, potentially improving reasoning and tool proficiency without hand-crafted rules. Enables scalable training in open environments.

What to do next

Clone https://github.com/kxfan2002/Reagent and train Agent-RRM on your multi-step task trajectories.

Who should care:Researchers & Academics

🧠 Deep Insight

Web-grounded analysis with 9 cited sources.

🔑 Key Takeaways

  • CUHK and Meituan researchers introduced **Agent-RRM**, a multi-faceted reward model that evaluates full agent trajectories with reasoning traces, critiques, and 0-1 quality scores to address sparse outcome-based rewards in agentic RL[1].
  • Agent-RRM was fine-tuned using GRPO (likely Generalized Reward Preference Optimization) to calibrate its scores, ensuring they are reliable rather than arbitrary[1].
  • The **Reagent framework** integrates Agent-RRM outputs via three strategies: Text-augmented Refinement, Reward-augmented Guidance (using scalar scores in RL reward functions), and Unified Feedback Integration[1].

🛠️ Technical Deep Dive

  • Agent-RRM processes agent trajectories to generate three outputs: explicit reasoning traces, detailed critiques, and a scalar 0-1 process score for overall quality[1].
  • Fine-tuning of Agent-RRM employed GRPO, an RL method to align and calibrate the reward model's scoring mechanism meta-ly[1].
  • Reagent's Reward-augmented Guidance mixes the scalar score from Agent-RRM into the total RL reward function alongside task success signals[1].
  • Improvements shown on GAIA (general AI assistant benchmark) and WebWalkerQA (web navigation QA tasks), highlighting gains in complex, multi-modal agent tasks[1].

🔮 Future ImplicationsAI analysis grounded in cited sources

Agent-RRM and Reagent advance agentic RL by providing dense, process-level feedback, enabling better training for multi-step tasks like web search and coding, potentially improving reliability in real-world deployments beyond binary outcomes.

⏳ Timeline

2026-01
Publication of Agent-RRM paper introducing reasoning reward model and Reagent framework
2026-02
YouTube explanation video released on Exploring Reasoning Reward Model for Agents

CUHK and Meituan researchers developed Agent-RRM, a reward model that scores entire Agent trajectories for reasoning quality and tool use, beyond just final outcomes. They curated a dataset of annotated traces and built the Reagent framework to integrate textual feedback and scores into training. This addresses sparse rewards in multi-step tasks like web search and coding.

Key Points

  • 1.Agent-RRM evaluates full trajectories, outputting analysis, critique, and 0-1 process score.
  • 2.Dataset of real Agent traces annotated to distinguish solid reasoning from lucky outcomes.
  • 3.Reagent framework unifies text feedback and scalar rewards for Agent RL training.
  • 4.Differentiates flawed execution from poor planning in complex, multi-modal tasks.

Impact Analysis

Provides dense supervision for long-horizon Agent tasks, potentially improving reasoning and tool proficiency without hand-crafted rules. Enables scalable training in open environments.

Technical Details

Agent-RRM trained on trajectories labeled with detailed 'grading' feedback, processes full traces including thoughts and tool calls. Outputs include internal analysis, simplified critique for Agents, and composite score distinguishing process quality.

📰

Weekly AI Recap

Read this week's curated digest of top AI events →

👉Read Next

AI-curated news aggregator. All content rights belong to original publishers.
Original source: 机器之心